Thursday, November 17, 2011

Censored.

I hate that word. It is difficult to get on my nerves politically, not because I don't know or care, but because I'm just cynical when it comes to politics.

But I take censorship personally.

Freedom of speech is one of the basic tenets of American society, and for any free society in the world. Without the ability to vocalize dissent, opinions, or artistic or even nonsensical self-expression, freedom is a dead letter. I refuse to live in such a society. So should you.

Congress currently has two bills pending that will drastically censor the Internet. Both bills will censor any website that violates unbelievably vague copyright laws. This blog, and several others, could go down for perhaps having an infringing link or even bothering to review the movies I do. I won't allow this to pass.

Please sign this petition; it only takes a few seconds and it costs you nothing. Show Congress that you won't let censorship become a part of the Internet.

Thursday, September 15, 2011

Tales From Earthsea Blow-By-Blow: Part 2

Wow. That was weird. I had the strangest dream my friend Jill took control of my blog and radically restructured it so that it looks way cooler, and also that my friend Alex suggested a cool new name for the blog which I adopted. Man, what a silly premise, I…

I’m being told that is exactly what happened, and I was so sleep-deprived that I didn’t realize it was real.

I should lay off the sugar.

Anyway, it’s been a while, right? Sorry about that. In my defense…no I have no defense. I guess I just suck. Nevermind that the school year here at Clark just started and that I do in fact have other commitments apart from a blog I do mainly for my own…amusement? Repentance? I don’t know. Point is, I’m sorry. Not let’s back to some idiocy, eh?

The yet-to-be named-wizard dude hears some wolves, which can only be a sign of good things, I’m sure. We then cut into an action scene of the wolves chasing Arren (and no I didn’t check to see if that’s how they spelt it, but that’s what I heard so I’m going with that) who is also somehow in the same unidentified desert riding some sort of deer. This could be the set up for a joke by someone with an obsessive need to qualify things, in that it’s nonsensical in its details.

So Arren gets knocked from his trusty steed, and is immediately surrounded by wolves and it looks like some serious action is about to go down! Okay, anime, you’ve failed to be a compelling story, but you can still be awesomely violent! Yay violence!

Arren (not even trying to draw the sword he killed his dad for): So, you are my death.

What?

WHAT?

ARE YOU KIDDING? YOU AREN’T GOING TO EVEN PUT UP A FIGHT! WHAT THE HELL’S THE MATTER WITH YOU?!

Then again, he is mentally unstable. So I can’t blame him too much I suppose. But now I care less if you die. Just a note.

Sadly, the wizard dude comes to his rescue, so Arren gets to act irrationally another day. He does so immediately by responding to the wizard’s question of “All you alright?” by looking paranoid and fainting. So no, I guess he isn’t. By the way, don’t know if you picked up on this, he’s the protagonist. Yep. Anime! Our protagonists are capable, just stupid!

Now it’s night. Arren wakes up and begins to search in terror for his penis I mean sword, which the wizard returns to him, grasping it by its long strong shaft as Arren looks on confused but relieved.

You see, movie? This is why you can’t give swords testicles. People like me will never NOT make jokes like that. It’s the law of the Internet to do so, or something.

Arren continues to act like a dick (lol) to the kindly wizard who is feeding him and just a little while ago saved his goddamn life because he’s emo and his problems matter or something. The Wizard correctly deduces that Arren is a long way from home (um, isn’t the fact that he’s in an uninhabited desert sort of clue for that one?) and that the sword is magic sword. The Wizard doubts if Arren…um…

Just a sec…

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Heh heh (cough)

Ahem. Anyway. The Wizard doubts Arren has yet the power to unsheathe the sword.

Yes. Really.

Yes, his main character arc will be centered on him trying to get a symbolic erection.

I'll wait a few seconds for the people laughing in the corner to come back.

(soft humming)

Alright, back to it. Then Arren gets freaked out by stars for no reason. He needs to man up or something....oh wait n- YOU SEE THE SWORD IS A METAPHOR! IT SYMBOLIZES MANHOOD AS EMPHASIZED BY THE HILT’S UNIQUE DESIGN WHICH ARREN IS NOT YET READY TO EMBRACE. ONLY BY CONQUERING HIS OWN FEARS ABOUT DEATH AND LIFE WILL HE TRULY BE READY TO WEILD THE SWORD AND ASSERT HIS MATURITY!

Ah! Damn you movie, making me shout your message for you....

Anyway, they pack up the next morning. The wizard kindly invites Arren to join him, and introduces himself as….Sparrowhawk.

I give up movie, you’re trying so hard to make me not take you seriously for even a millisecond. You guys spent days throwing Scrabble tiles around until you got that, didn't you? How in the hell are we supposed to take the name Sparrowhawk seriously? I feel stupid just saying it out loud. Hell, go tell someone you're hanging out with your new friend Sparrowhawk, see how many weird looks you get.

Oh and of course the soundtrack swells with musical pride when he says “Sparrowhawk.” Get used to that sort of thing because people will feel the constant need to say his name dramatically every time someone else says it. Yes, we get it, he's really fucking important. I didn't need middle school level-acting to remind me of his significance.

Also, Sparrowhawk is voiced by Timothy Dalton. Please insert your own James Bond joke, I'm far too lazy to come up with one on my own at the moment.

They travel through the desert to the fertile plains that lie maybe an hour away, clearly taking their geography from 10,000 BC. Sparrowhawk mutters about how people are abandoning their land or something, I don’t know, I’m still wondering how they got from the Sahara to what appears to be the Grecian coastline in an hour on foot. Oh, and Sparrowhawk confesses he has no idea of their destination. Are you really surprised?

They wander for a while and…okay in that shot you can clearly see the deert behind them. Seriously what the hell’s the layout of this place? Isn’t it supposed to be mostly ocean? Because it’s called Earthsea? Hello?

Screw it. They keep going and, in less than a day, they reach the town of…Rome. Yes, I know it’s called something else, but everything about it screams Rome at the top of its voice at random passersby while drinking from a used toga! Good lord what the hell is this place?! Wherethe hell is anything located? And furthermore, this looks just like the town Arren was just in! DID HE GO FULL CIRCLE? IS HE A WANTED MAN? EXPLAIN! EXPLAINNN! GAHHHHHH!

They head into town and witness some slave traffickers immediately upon entering the city because I guess the writers just desperately wanted to show everyone that this city is EVIL. But only a complete idiot would fail to recognize what’s going on there. It’s obvious what with the chains and the whips and the people offering to buy them and Arren has no idea what’s happening does he?

Arren: Are those people criminals?

Yeah that’s what I thought. Weren’t you a fucking prince at one point? As in, someone who would know about this sort of stuff? Oh well, another point for brain damage. It has a commanding lead. Arren has yet to hit the buzzer once so far. HE IS SUCH A LIKABLE PROTAGONIST!

There’s a long period of them in the city. It’s fucking boring. I don’t feel the story moving at all during this part, and I think the writers only threw it in because a city killed their parents and they will have their revenge. As a result, let’s just fast-forward, shall we?

Nothing.

Nothing.

Nothing.

Sparrowhawk insults Arren’s fashion sense. OH SNAP!

That must sting coming from James Bond. (See? got one)

Nothing.

Something about magic not being real, I wonder if the wolves would agree.

Nothing.

Pointlessness.

Nothing.

Is that a trireme?

Nothing.

Arren is cornered by a drug dealer. Something about how drugs are evils. I didn’t realize this was a PSA film. Thank you very much film, I feel so much more enlightened now. I wonder if this will be ever be mentioned again. Lol, of course it won’t, what am I saying? A plot? What’s that?

Also, I don’t think a movie that can only really be enjoyed under the influence of illegal substances should criticize drug use. That’s kinda pot calling the kettle black.

Oh and apparently wizards are losing their powers. Doesn’t seem to be bothering Sparrowhawk, though. What with beating up wolves from the other side of continents and what not.

Okay this is getting long, all the movie is saying at this point is "HOW DARE YOU URBANIZE?!" and making wild accusations about how heavily populated areas kills puppies or something. Why don’t come back in a bit and I’ll let you know when something happens? Class dismissed.

Saturday, September 10, 2011

RANDOM!

Remember that saying, "Ignore that man behind the curtain?" Well, apply it now! This blog has been invaded by a friend/blogger of host beloved host, Ben!

And
Now
Randomness!













That smile makes me happy like pancakes. And I HATE pancakes!



And that is the end of this blog takeover!

Until next time everyone!

Sunday, September 4, 2011

Tales From Earthsea Blow-By-Blow: Part 1

I’ll confess right now that I’m not anime’s number one fan. I don’t hate the genre, by any means, but I never got into it the way some people seem to do (especially not the cat-ears people. They‘re probably beyond my help). Maybe it’s because the only examples of anime I watched as were Pokemon and occasionally Digimon if I felt bored and self-deprecating, or maybe I managed to wrangle up a real social life, I don’t know. But as of the last few years I’ve seen examples of fantastic animes such as Princess Mononoke and Ponyo, and while both of those were absolutely fucking absurd they were the perfect kind of absurd—the universes in which they existed made sense, the characters were interesting and likable, the stories were captivating, and the absurdity added to the sense of wonder the movies were trying to convey. If you are looking to jump into anime, start with those films because they’re solid all around (and even though I haven’t seen it, I heard good things about Spirited Away).

Anime fans, on the other hand, will notice that all these recommended films were written and directed by the same man--Hayao Miyazaki. And why not? He’s generally considered the best anime writer/director of all time, with his films receiving Academy Award nominations for Best Animated Film twice (and winning once in 2002). His films are, by and large, classics of both anime and animated films in general. However, did you know he has a son, Goro, who is also an anime director? You didn’t? That’s probably for the best because he is living proof that talent is not a familial trait at all. He’s only directed two films, one titled From up on Poppy Hill which was realized this year, and Tales from Earthsea released in 2006, which he also co-wrote and is the subject for today’s wonderful journey into total nonsensical stupidity. It’s made by Studio Ghibli, which Hayao co-founded, and is the same studio that released Hayao’s films. So that’s a good sign, right? Right? Please? I need this.

My science-fiction oriented fans will note that Earthsea is a series of novels by Ursula K. Le Guin, and indeed this movie is based off of several novels in that series, if by based you mean has nothing to do with in the slightest. In fact, let’s go to the author herself for her view as to the movie’s faithfulness:

Le Guin: (as seen on http://www.ursulakleguin.com/GedoSenkiResponse.html) Please do not hold any writer except the script-writer responsiblefor anything in a film. Don't ask the book's author "Why did they . . . ?" She is wondering too.

Oh. Okay. Well that would imply that the writers completely butchered the story and in fact produced something that not only bears no resemblance to the source material but in fact was truly confusing and infuriating for all involved. But, come on, what are the chances of that?

So the movie begins with a quote which may be from the books but I have no idea, I’m not even sure if it have anything to do with the movie, except to say “Hey! We read the books ! Honest we did!” Then we cut to a ship caught in a storm. Everyone looks panicked and nervous, which is the appropriate response to this situation, granted. The captain, who by the way has the most atrocious Jamaican accent I’ve ever heard outside the Apple Jacks commercials, calls for his wizard (I’m guessing that’s standard issue in this world of [ridiculous name here] right? To have an immensely powerful person who can command the elements just w
ork on insignificant commercial vessels?). The wizard then turns and says this:

Wizard (unnamed): Captain! I can’t remember the names. The true names. Of the wind. And the waves.

Wow. Just wow. I would have nominated that for least convincing dialogue I’ve ever heard, but we have two hours to get through and it only gets worse I promise. Also, what the hell does that even mean? True names are a common trope in fantasy, sure, but here the rules surrounding them are never explained properly. It’s inconsistent and it never makes the connection with anything we see on screen, not really. Think of true names in this production as plot hole spackle, only the people applying the spackle are blind and also have amnesia so they forget they have spackle and just kind of wave their paint brushes around going “rable rable rable.” (No, I don’t know why they’re saying that, why would I know that?)

Also, even though we’ll get a semi-explanation as to why he said that, it’s still kind of weird to say, isn’t it? It’s so melodramatic and poorly written, you’d think the guy forgot the names because he just pissed himself from fear.

Or maybe he’s just dumb. That’s a possibility too.

The lookout says there’s something above the clouds. At first I thought it was evil lightning, but experience has taught me it will never be evil lightning as much I hope it will be. No! It’s something far more ridiculous I’m afraid. Actually it’s a dragon. He flies around a bit and is intimidating and most definitely a dragon. Obviously it’s a dragon. It was right there. Everyone saw it:

Stupid Wizard: It’s…a dragon!

NO FUCKING SHIT IT’S A DRAGON! WE WERE RIGHT THERE! If you honestly needed that to tell you it’s a dragon, I’m surprised you have the mental capacity to read! Another dragon shows up out of nowhere and they tear each other apart in a fairly gruesome but short fight sequence until one of them falls dead into the ocean. YOU SEE THIS IS A METAPHOR! THE FIGHTING DRAGONS SYMBOLIZE THE UPSET OF THE TAOIST BALANCE OF THIS WORLD, WHICH LEADS TO THE DISCORD THAT SPREADS THROUGHOUT THE LAND AND MOTIVATES THE PLOT! I FELT THE COMPLUSIVE NEED TO SHOUT THAT AT THE TOP OF VOICE AT YOU, THE AUDIENCE!

Whoa that was weird. Sorry. Anyway, back to the film.

George Wizard Bush: Dragons fighting. That’s impossible.


Okay, I’m convinced you’re slow. There’s no way you would say that line that way unless you were completely dense because you just saw that happening literally five seconds ago! You were the first response to that awesome sight and you came up with that?! You’re thicker than overcooked Rice-A-Roni in a cement mixer! Oh, by the way, hoped you like those characters because we’ll never see them again after this scene. Hooray!


Then we cut to a city and a grand palace, in which a group of advisers relate the details of a pestilence spreading throughout the land, killing off livestock and babies. It’s then we realize that one side of the table all have 1920’s villains’ mustaches for no reason, making this scene impossible to take seriously for even one second. Seriously, did they all just come back from a “Tie Girlfriends to the Railroad Tracks” Convention?

The King, who in a bold move actually gives a shit, initiates a quarantine of infected areas, calls on wizard/doctors to search for a cure, and sends provisions to the stricken areas. Wow, he seems to have his head on straight. I HOPE NOTHING BAD HAPPENS TO HIM OR ANYTHING.

There’s also a drought and the wizards are completely and inexplicably useless at this moment, so it looks like everything’s fucked. The King then consults his…most trusted advisor? Chief Wizard? Grandfather? It’s not really explained who he is or why he would know anything, but the movie calls him Root so that’s what we’ll go with for now. Don’t get attached though we’ll never see him again after this sequence. Root says the “light of the balance” is dimming. I have no idea what that means, but evidently it’s important to…sustain the world? Sure, why not? If I keep asking questions I’ll just fall over dead from frustration. The King then learns about the dragons the sailors saw, and apparently they never show up in this region ever. I’m not really sure what to make of that, since dragons will keep showing up for no reason throughout the film anyway. Man, I hope that doesn’t make this entire sequence useless or anything. That would be sad.

Root then goes into the most vapid and pointless monologue I’ve ever had the good fortune to hear. Let’s take a listen.

Root: In ages past, dragons and men were one. Those who lusted after wealth chose the land and the sea and became men. Those who cherished freedom became dragons and chose
wind and fire. Since then, dragons and men have remained divided. To hear that dragons have been seen, let alone fighting, means the darkness that threatens us is rapidly approaching.

Ahhhh. I love you, stupid monologue. Let’s break this down, because it bears breaking. For starters, what does this mean? How the hell does this relate to anything we’re going to see or will see? What purpose did that information dump serve? How does an evolutionary history that would make Darwin rise from the dead to beat the writers to death with a finch fit into the world we’re watching? How does choosing freedom mean turning into a dragon? And isn’t the darkness that threatens you here, now? What with the disease? And the drought? Hello? Movie?

Also, wouldn’t the sentence “To hear that dragons have been fighting, let alone seen, means etc.” make more sense? Because, you know, the wizard on the boat said that dragons fighting is impossible and you just said dragons being seen is also incredibly rare?! Good god, movie, you have to try and make sense in the realm of your own insanity! Otherwise, so help me, I’ll hit you with a cherry picker!

Let’s keep going, why waste time with totally relevant questions we’ll never answer? On top of all this, Prince Arren is missing. One of the hand maidens has to tell the king this. He sounds like a fantastic father figure, doesn’t he? Can’t keep track of the HEIR TO THE GODDAMN THRONE!

Then the Queen shows up and BRRPAHAHAHAHA ! I’m sorry, you can’t be ser
ious, movie! You can’t be serious! The Queen has dark eye-shadow, is unbelievably haughty, and she’s holding a cat?! No! Come on! Be reasonable! She can’t be that transparent a villain! It’s against the law or something!

Anyway, the Queen tells the meddlesome, deeply concerned handmaiden not to bother the King, who probably should still hear this, and in fact dismisses the handmaiden's concerns about Arren’s mental health. This is what I like to call, stupid. Dismissing possible mental illness HAS NEVER WORKED OUT WELL IN THE HISTORY OF EVER. Just saying. She even calls it “heedless.” Bitch!

Oh by the way, don’t worry. The Queen isn’t the villain. We just won’t ever see her again. Bye!

The King goes off alone into a dark corridor to “tend to his correspondents”, whatever that means. I’m pretty sure most kings would have a guy for that, but sure, okay, what’s one more implausibility on top of everything else? Remember how I mentioned it’s a dark corridor? I bet nothing bad will possibly happen here. What are the chances?

Why are there no guards here, by the way? Don’t most palaces have guards on standby in corridors like this? So, you know, no one gets stabbed or anything? The King even looks down the dark, ominous hallway behind him since that is the perfect place to hide if you were planning to stab someone.

Oh, by the way, SPOILERS ALERT AHEAD OH GOOD GOD PROTECT THE CHILDREN SHEILD YOUR EYES HIDE YOUR FAMILY AHHHHHHHHHHHHH, the King is immediately stabbed by an attacker who ambushes him from the dark, ominous hallway. ALL CLEAR!

Yeah, if you didn’t see that coming, you’re as short staffed mentally as the palace is physically. Where the hell are the guards?! How could this possibly go down without a single witness?! Oh and the assassin takes the King’s sword, and…wait…what’s that?

Do you see that?
That can’t be what I think it is, right?
No.

Oh god.

The sword has testicles. Yes, you’re seeing that correctly. THE GODDAMN SWORD HAS GODDAMN BALLS. Only the most insane and depraved human beings with no sense of subtly or nuance would actually take the sword, already a heavy phallic symbol, and actually
TAKE THE NEXT STEP AND GIVE THE SWORD FUCKING TESTICLES. THERE’S NO HOPE FOR HUMANITY WHEN IF YOU THINK THE AUDIENCE NEEDS TO BE BEATEN OVER THE HEAD WITH THE PHALLIC NATURE OF THE SWORD!WE ALREADY GET IT! WE AREN’T STUPID!


It’s right here that I knew I was in for a ride into idiocy. I was prepared to overlook the ridiculousness before (it’s anime, after all), but this…there’s no way this can be redeemed. Nothing you can do will make up for what I just saw and will continue to see every time I look at that sword.
Fuck you.
Anyway, we are only five goddamn minutes into this movie, and we’ve already hit more stupid than can be contained in a Republican Convention (swish), so we best continue. The King whispers Arren’s name as he dies, so…oh…Arren killed him. Remember how two minutes ago the Queen COMPLETELY DIMISSED THE IDEA THAT ARREN MIGHT BE DISTURBED? DO YOU SEE WHY THAT NEVER WORKS OUT WELL?

TITLE SCREEN! Man, the nothing right there is certainly helpful for the ungodly confused. Like me.

The story proper finally begins with a scene a man in a silly hat and robes sailing a boat into…the Sahara Desert? I’m not sure. Anyway, he has a reasonable goatee (as opposed to a Star Trek goatee), a strange mark on his face that looks like bad finger-paint, and he has a staff. I’ll give you exactly one second to guess what his job might be. Did you say “Wizard”? Sorry, I was looking for “Tax Specialist” (the wizard of accounting, some might say). The yet-to-be-named-wizard wanders off into the desert for…um…reasons? What are reasons? He actually does wander into a spectacular sight of several ships buried in the desert, implying this was once ocean, which does bring me to my one good note—this movie has great animation. It does. Clearly people with drawing talent worked on this. It’s just that what they drew doesn’t resemble a story at all. The wizard walks into a hole in one of the ships, steps inside, immediately steps on the bones of a corpse, and looks blankly at it. I too would look blankly at the remains of a fellow human being so I’m glad this film appeals to the emotional sensibilities of my demographic. You know. Sociopaths. Blank expressions will become a motif throughout the film as a result of this. Yay!

Holy holes Batman! We are less than ten minutes into this movie! I think we need to break this up into bite size chunks again. Meanwhile, I will diligently continue this epic quest into…

I was just informed there are s’mores. Bye!

All information on this movie was derived from IMDB. All images taken from Tales From Earthsea film copyright 2006. This film is owned by Studio Ghibli and is not owned by me.

Monday, August 29, 2011

Reds

I made a declaration recently that if I am to do these reviews on a consistent basis, I would have to lay down a few ground rules, and I made it a declaration because it seemed less intense than an exclamation. First, I’m not going to do blow-by-blows for good movies because I’d like people to go judge for themselves the quality of those movies, and because there is significantly less material for satire or criticism. Also it’ll give me a chance to exercise that part of my brain that isn’t based in swears. This rule also applies to theatrical releases, so you don’t need to worry about spoilers for the newest movies. So with that in mind let’s review something good.

Reds is a 1981 film co-written, produced, directed by and starring Warren Beatty, and I think he did something with coffee-fetching as well. That, and the fact that the film was coma-inducingly long at over three hours long, were the only things I knew about the film before deciding/being convinced by my mother to watch the film, and while I did learn many things since, I’m not sure as to how much of it was worth it. The plot follows the life of revolutionary American Communist reporter John Reed and his longtime girlfriend/colleague/comrade Louise Bryant (played by Diane Keaton) from 1915 in the midst of the First World War to his death in 1920 (whoops spoilers sorry) primarily following his involvement in the Russian Revolution. Now before I go into it, let me say this; this is a good movie. The script is strong with good pacing and sense of history and time, the acting is top-notch, including a fantastic performance by Jack Nicholson as the playwright Eugene O’Neill (even though he doesn’t get as much screen time as he should with such a prominent place on the promotion) and the sets are fantastic, feeling vast and diverse as the narrative spans across the globe. But the problem is I don’t think the movie takes advantage of any of the things it has going for it.

Part of the problem is the structure. The movie is divided between the historical fiction with the big name actors and the giant budget and interviews with people who lived at the time talking about John Reed, Louise Bryant, or just the time period, and this is not done poorly or anything; it gives a real sense of history and gives a great picture of the characters and the setting and most importantly of the people who lived through this period, but it doesn’t feel like it belongs. The interviews don’t fit into the film’s scheme as a grand epic, and at times the interviews cut off the action, ruining the pacing. It feels like two movies got jumbled together and the editor got woozy and fainted before he could properly separate them. But even if the historical fictional was properly strained out, I’m not convinced it’s a great film. Part of this is the length; while the script does give a great sense of time, it has too much time on its hands. Every excruciating detail is shown and analyzed, even if you got the idea several minutes ago. The film uses montages in an attempt to condense some time, but there are a lot of montages (although unlike House of 9 these montages do serve a purpose and are done with talent and care) and the montages are longggggggggggg. The film takes so much time with the small details that nothing feels large or significant, and you don’t feel like you missed anything if you, say, took five minutes to do dishes during the film. In short, nothing feels epic, which is a huge problem given the style and running time.

I was told by my mother that the point was to show that life goes on without us and that the big moments are brief in the grand scheme of life’s tapestry, but there are ways to do that better. In The Lord of the Rings movie, the epic scenes still feel epic and exciting and the quiet scenes that reflect on the motion of history allow the audience to feel the confusion and depression of the characters who have gone through such amazing things and now must find a way to adjust to normal life. There’s a way to do both is what I’m saying. In Reds, nothing feels captivating or powerful or epic; all the action sort of blends together without purpose or power. You never empathize with the characters or grow to care about them, and even the scenes of pitched battles or revolutions feel small and unimportant in the grand plan of the movie. There’s just nothing to gravitate to, which is the movie’s biggest flaw. The problem stems from Beatty’s direction—I don’t think he had a clear idea of what he wanted for this movie, and just kind of let the movie go without direction or polish, both of which were sorely needed. The movie needs a center, which Warren Beatty tries to give in his performance, but though John Reed is interesting he never captures the audience’s attention the way Warren Beatty needs. The film feels like it wants to be everything at once and gives a less than great job all around. The film needs to be more art and less detail. Also the editing is a bit off. Just a thought.

I’d like to reemphasize that the movie isn’t awful though, it is actually quite good, made with care and attention and with a lot going for it. Reds captures the rise of the socialist and communist movements in America and across the world with accuracy and fairness, as well as the internal problems of those movements and once again the acting and dialogue are solid with good characterization and idea of the setting and subject matter, but the movie lacks the artistry to truly captivate and appeal to a broader audience. It’s worth checking out if you’re on maternity leave or have way too much free time on your hands, and it’s a worthy piece of film history (Warren Beatty won Best Director for it) but perhaps it isn’t aging as well as other films.


Monday, August 22, 2011

House of Nine: Part 2

Before anyone judges me for the lateness of this post, let me start by apologizing. This post is abnormally late, partly because my own schedule has not been as conductive to reviews as I would like (those were some hefty nachos) and partly because of my own reluctance to continue watching a movie that I would give no stars to if I was feeling as charitable as Ebenezer Scrooge prior to his Scooby Doo-type encounters with the spirits of chocolate smiles (hint: I’m not). But this is entirely my fault and I’m sorry. Now, let’s get back to watching something truly ridiculous and infuriating! It’ll be just having cupcakes in an Iron Maidens and the cupcakes have black beans in them!

It’s time for character building because the writers are desperate to make you connect with these half-excuses for people so the killings become extra-poignant. They’ve almost forgotten that we couldn’t care less about any of them because the acting is worse than Meghan Fox in the Transformers movies or Kevin Costner in…anything he’s been in. Also they’re one-dimensional. That’s worth remembering.

Here’s what we learn: Druggie has issues with personal space, Cop has a kid, Father Hopper prays, and Frenchman and No Impact Woman are married and he’s unemployed or something. The end. There I did it in a sentence. Take that, writers.

Meanwhile, after a montage (that’s three!) of the house that reminds us that the house is still there, Cop gets attacked in his sleep and manages to keep hold of the gun. Bickering ensues. If it seems like I’m skipping over important details, don’t worry, you can probably predict what’s happening. This isn’t rocket science. First grade science really.

Father Hopper then blithers (I love that word) on about God and purpose and the Golden Rule. However, I don’t believe any of them trapped nine people in a house. So maybe the Golden Rule doesn’t apply. Just saying.

Then the Cop stops and listens. I don’t hear anything. He’s convinced the other cops have found them. I still don’t hear anything. He runs towards the door, then stops and listens again. I still hear nothing. Seriously, either he’s Superman from 1897 or he’s finally jumped off the straight and narrow and is more bent than a crazy straw. My bets on the latter, because Superman would have none of this shit. Everyone bangs on the door (by the way, later we’re going to discover later why this makes no sense, and it’s a doozie) and screaming. It’s all dramatic and heartbreaking and other tragic adjectives. And then Cop Drops the key to the liquor cabinet.

Let’s stop for a moment and think about just how stupid a move like that is right now.

Ahhhhh….

Time for a montage of them drinking (four). Truly this was worthy of such attention that it takes for-fucking-ever for them to stop. If you’re wondering/hoping one of them dies of alcohol poisoning, sorry that would be way too easy/convenient/ helpful. Also I should note that a crappy pop-rock song is playing over all of this (I think Nickelback was uncredited in this movie).

Then Frenchman gets all creepy over Survivor. It’s pointless, uncomfortable, and doesn’t fit with his character at all. So the writers really are pushing him for some reason. Don’t know why.

HES puts on rap music. Of course. Then it triggers…oh Christ another goddamn montage. Seriously????! WHY DID WE JUST GO INTO ANOTHER MONTAGE? WHAT IS ACHIEVING?! IS EVERYONE ON THIS PROJECT BRAIN DAMAGED?! This time it’s them dancing to the rap music, with No Impact Woman and HES dancing flirtatiously and causing Frenchman (who was breaking up some glass for some reason and shaping them like knives I dunno why. Culinary school maybe?) to flip out and get in a fight with HES who of course starts beating the shit out of him. Don’t be silly.

Oh shit. No Impact Woman was just pushed into a railing! She’s dead! She’s the first to go! And HES killed her! I know it was accident, but come on that’s still hurtful! Finally someone has the good sense to TURN OFF THE RAP MUSIC and mourn the considerable loss of such a fine character.

Frenchman’s weeping, Survivor’s crying hysterically, Cop locks HES in a bedroom, and Father Hopper asks the Intercom to stop this. Yeah, I don’t think he’s going to be helping you right now. I think, gasp, choke, that he might be enjoying this! No! Really!

They put the body in the basement, and yep it’s time for another montage! (Six) This one just shows the other eight people just looking at things and crying. Frenchman smells his dead wife’s lipsticks and yeah now it’s getting a tad weird now that he’s putting on her lipstick and kisses the mirror/camera. Why? Because. No Impact Man keeps waiting by the dumbwaiter, because I guess that’s his character.

Cop judges HES guilty (because he’s the law here? I don’t know it’s weird. What’s happening?). Father Hopper asks if Frenchman is okay (hint: No. You should see his mourning ritual). They ration out some food, and Cop throws a potato into HES’ room. HES doesn’t seem to like it and wastes it by throwing at the now shut door. Then Father Hopper, in what might be a poor move, opens the door to the room with the KNOWN KILLER to give HES more food, and long story short Cop is beaten to death. By HES. Yes, he did kill the cop. And he’s killed the most people so far. Cop, clearly suffering from brain damage, gives the gun to Father Hopper, respecting his good judgment and ability to determine character and, oh wait he LET OUT HES! DON’T GIVE HIM THE GUN, HE’S OBVIOUSLY GOING TO DO SOMETHING STUPID! HE OPENED THE DOOR OF A KNOWN MURDERER AND YOU JUST DIED BECAUSE HE FUCKED UP! GAH!

On the bright side, there’s now room for single bedrooms. So yay!

The others move Cop’s body to the basement as well, because that’s helpful. Close up of Survivor! OH YEAH! SUPER IMPORTANT TO SEE SHE’S SAD! THEY HAD MAYBE TWO MINUTES OF SCREEN TIME TOGETHER!

Frenchman takes of his glasses dramatically then stares. ALSO HELPFUL!

The dumbwaiters brought them potatoes and wine, clearly figuring that the people he's captured are violent alcoholics who just need a little more buzz to start the murder fest. They seem all drawn to making poor choices even when obvious solutions KEEP FUCKING STARING THEM IN THE FACE. It also comes with a lovely thank you note for finally getting to the point, but Bitch actually asks what it means. Remember, there aren’t stupid questions. But that one is very stupid.

Frenchman brings HES his “reward” (how was he locked up again? We didn’t see anyone force him back into his room) showing no resentment for the man who killed his wife whatsoever. Impressive, and not at all sinister.

Montage of everyone distrusting each other! It’s seven now right? I’m losing track.

Father Hopper and Survivor still seem to like each other, and they both discover…oh god. No. No this can’t be happening. No way. Frenchman lynched HES. Yes. Really. I’m not even kidding. I’m convinced now that the writers have never met a black person in their entire lives, and only heard of them through rap videos and Klan meetings.

Survivor says HES didn’t seem suicidal. REALLY? I WOULD NEVER GUESS!!!! Frenchman denies it of course, accusations fly, etc. The fellowship is broken.

MONTAGE! HOORAY! EIGHT! This time it’s a video feed of everyone in their rooms! It does nothing except show Frenchman putting on his wife’s lipstick again, drawing on himself, and practicing a quick draw with his glass knife which he’s hidden above his doorway. I’m starting to get the feeling he might not, you know, be well. Maybe, I don’t know, he’s insane or something and is about to go kill crazy. Just maybe. Stay tuned.

Father Hopper tries to elicit the help of No Impact Man, who is still food obsessed for no reason, who of course is no help because… I’m lost, because he’s starving or something, it makes no sense, no one else seems hungry. Druggie still has personal space issues and trouble not antagonizing Bitch, a clearly unstable human being. Also Bitch can’t flush a toilet. Apparently.

Frenchman sneaks up on Survivor in the bathroom. He grabs a lamp and throws it into the sink she’s holding! She…dies? Of Electrocution? Are you KIDDING? SURVIVOR CAN’T DIE! IT RUINS MY BET! DAMN IT! THERE’S GOES ANOTHER PENNY!

Points for improvisation though.

Bitch, in a move absolutely everyone saw coming, stabs Druggie in the neck with a corkscrew. She dies. No fanfare, that one was as obvious as a stripper in a police academy. Father Hopper pulls his gun on No Impact Man when he tries to take more than his fair share of the potatoes (huh. An Irishman who isn’t potato-happy. Maybe there’s hope after all). What’s the deal with this guy and food? Usually a potato is filling enough, And no one else seems to be starving, so what’s his problem? Is he wasting away? Is he bulimic or something?

Montage! Nine! This time it’s about nothing and short, so mostly it’s padding.

Frenchman actually pretends to discover the body after Hopper does, and acts shocked. Yeah no one buys it. Come on. He’s insane. He’s French. It all adds up.

Frenchman starts bragging about killing her to Father Hopper, who keeps walking away as Frenchie rants nonsensically about something. Cheese? What do Frenchmen like? No Impact Man is coercing a blowjob out of Bitch (wow this movie sucks. Oh shit sorry). Then we cut back to Survivor as she BULLSHIT! Sorry even thinking about this makes me swear involuntarily. SHE JUST WOKE THE FUCK UP! NO! NO WRITERS! THAT DOES NOT HAPPEN! YOU DO NOT JUST WAKE UP AFTER A) DYING OR B) BEING ELECTROCUTED THEN DYING! FUCK!

Anyway, after that taste of pure stupid, Frenchman is still taunting Father H and asking for the gun, because he’s clearly trustworthy. Then Father H decides he’s had enough of this shit and shoots Frenchman, which scares the shocked (lol) Survivor into running into Frenchman’s room, trip over the toilet, and finds the sharp glass he hid there. No Impact Man chokes Bitch with his belt while she isn’t looking, who gets his head blown off by Father Hopper. Bitch survives, but then Frenchman, undeterred by being fucking shot runs back to his room, grabs his glass knife, runs back and stabs Father H. If you're wondering where that quick draw thing he was practicing earlier comes into play congratulations! You remembered the script better than the director did! Frenchman grabs the gun and shoots Bitch, making her survival completely pointless, and finally shoot Father Hopper. This all takes place in under two minutes, so if you didn’t care before, wow are you not going to care now. Frenchman starts screaming that he won, that he wants his money and a baguette or something, he shows off his lipstick, etc. He rips his shirt off KIRK STYLE! He also hears Survivor moving around and, obviously wondering how the hell she survived electrocution completely unharmed, runs after her asking for help, but she cleverly…runs right past him. Not a criminal mastermind this guy. He’s forgotten that he’s bleeding from a bullet wound right now. She runs and hides under a bed, the best off all options (by the way, he left the gun behind. Professor Moriarty we have here). She stabs him in the leg as he tries to escape him from her own poor hiding place. Somehow he’s able to still run (maybe he deserves to win at this point. There’s no quit in him). She holds him off until they both go over the side of the balcony and she manages to stab him without getting stabbed herself. I’d call bullshit on this, what with momentum and all, but she’s apparently able to bend the laws of physics to survive. She is Survivor after all. And she’s won! Game’s over! She’s sobbing hysterically because that is the logical thing to do I suppose, but she’s won! Frenchman is dead! Another French defeat soundly assured!

Some people will note that last section seemed unusually long. That's because it all happens in maybe three minutes, so if I seemed to be rushing through it, it's only because the movie desperately wants to end its miserable existence.

The doors open up into a white hallway (see? What the hell did cop hear?) with a bag in it containing the millions of worthless dollars (what’s exchange rates these days?), which Survivor picks up as she walks into the light as the movie wills itself to become Cube.

She then walks into the plot twist. You’ll never guess. Nope. Nope not that either. Did someone say “She walks into an identical house that contains haggard looking people holding bags that look like hers”? No? That’s because that’s a fucking stupid plot twist. It makes no sense. Why would he put the winners there? Shouldn’t the winners be dead already, since there isn’t any food or whatnot? Are they supposed to kill each other? If so, it doesn’t look they’re doing that. Doesn’t this ruin the point of the movie, which I’m guessing was that humanity is cruel without their social bonds and how can society function and all that nonsense? Yes? Hello? Anyone?

This movie was terrible, the lowest of the low. Imagine a movie made by people who have no knowledge of what a story, a movie, or a person constitutes. Characters? Hah, cardboard does just fine! Plot? Not necessary! Just throw in some pseudo-intellectual jargon and some violence and let’s go! Direction? For what? Remember the lack of anything resembling plot or characters? Yep. This is shit. Total shit. I’m pretty sure there isn’t a redeemable thing about this movie. Even the camera is made of feces.

Thanks to Josh for his help in powering through this turd spreadsheet. I’ll be taking requests for the next movie from anyone.

Saturday, August 13, 2011

House of 9: Part 1

Well, here we go; I’ve been putting off this review for far too long already, and now my schedule is clear and all the stars have lined up like the kindergartners of fate, so I have no choice but to dive right in and share the misery of the first film I found Netflix surfing: House of 9.

Horror has never been my preferred genre. I’ve never felt the urge to strangle a kitten over a horror film-- only a gecko at the most, but this is because horror, by and large, sucks. Most horror films I’ve seen are comprised of equal parts pointless gore, jump scares, and characters I wish died before the killer actually arrives so I can leave early but sadly no film has yet captured that sentiment. With the popularity of the Saw franchise, these things are only getting worse too. Seriously, go to the theaters and try to defend any of the horror films playing, but you shouldn’t do that because you are wrong and will be slapped. All they are now are random gore and bitchy human beings becoming random gore—there’s no weight to the violence portrayed on screen, no sympathy for the victims of these attacks, and nothing to keep me from punching the screen from the sheer lack of entertainment I feel except the price of the TV. But this may not prove anything! Statistics can be wrong! Maybe this film, like Black Swan or Oldboy, will rise above the ugly stereotypes the rest of its brethren perpetuate. Maybe this will be the grand exception that helps to restore my faith in a tarnished genre that needs a heroic film to save it from-

I just read the tagline that proudly proclaims that it is “borrowing from Agatha Christie and the plots of Saw and Saw II.”

Sigh.

Alright let’s get shit over with already. The film is from across the pond, so at least the shit has kickass accents and, oh wait, I forgot, Dennis Hopper is in this. Dennis Hopper the American who made a living off of American characters. Fantastic. Let’s just take a look at this man’s track record, shall we? According to IMDB, this man was in Easy Rider, the original True Grit, Apocalypse Now, Blue Velvet, Super Mario Bros., Waterworld, and then literally nothing I recognize nor anything I think you’d recognize. My point is his career is following a pattern of decline, to put it charitably (the uncharitable version has much more swearing. I have to think of the children after all). Anyway, at the helm of this particular capsizing canoe made of granite and failure is Steven R. Monroe, whose work as a cameraman is impressive and versatile (including Pee-Wee’s Playhouse) but as a director is responsible for the remake of I Spit on Your Grave, a title single-handedly responsible for causing hundreds of people to die from embarrassment at ticket windows across the country. So that gives a pretty good indication on where we’re going with this one.

Alright, so we open up with the credits played over a montage of images of the inside of a house from a video feed camera, random people we don’t know being kidnapped, and images of London from the point of view of a first-time acid user. Montages are a motif in this movie. Let’s count them! This is one! Hahaha! Seriously, though, the editing in these first few minutes is actually somewhat sickening; not because of gore, but because the tonal whiplash of the images on film keeps changing so rapidly—and the scenes to establish that THIS IS LONDON LOOK BIG BEN THAT’S BRITISH RIGHT? U.K TOTALLY YEAH are shot in such a poor fast-forward—that it’s hard to figure out what’s going on or why I should care, and its actually confusing me a little. What happened to that last person? Did they get kidnapped so that they could receive a tour of London by the world’s most insistently English cokehead? And why does the video feed footage have to be spliced in to this? And why is the music a slow paced hymn that doesn’t fit with the tone?

When that montage finally comes to an end and the film crashes from its sugar binge, we find one of the kidnapped characters awaken. She’s at first rather bland about the situation, but don’t worry, that’ll continue throughout. She starts to explore her surroundings, which is basically a bunch of gray marble hallways. That’s it really, that’s basically the whole setting. Gray hallways, some gray bedrooms, a gray meeting room with an upstairs area, a gray kitchen and some gray basements. At least the coloring is consistent, I thought as I reached for the bottle of Jack with the toothbrush I was informed is the proper instrument of drinking this beverage, noticing the curtains are also gray as are the bricks blocking up the windows. Whoops, spoilers. Anyway, this setting is actually rather disorienting despite its simplicity; I had trouble figuring out where people were half the time, because the geography of the space is not well defined in the slightest. Everything looks the same, so there really are’t any features to give location any meaning. It’s like the Where’s Waldo? puzzle with the ten million Waldos and they all look the fucking same!

Anyway, the female character finds some people sleeping in a room, tries the front door of the house, keeps trying the door, tries again, finally takes the hint that maybe it’s locked, takes off her scarf, goes…why did the scarf falling get a slow-motion shot? Was that really fucking important, Mr. Monroe? Is that a symbol of some sort? Because it never leads anywhere. I know it for a fact. So what’s the point? Don’t look at the guy next to you, I want an answer! Why?!!

Well moving on from that, the female character, who I will name Survivor because obviously she’s going to survive. Come on, look at her. She’s going to live. It’s obvious. Survivor, in a weird long shot, goes to the meeting room, goes to the upstairs portion, looks at a blocked window, moves across the balcony, trips while looking at a weird painting, and now all of a sudden starts to really flip out about her situation. Guess the fall hurt a bit, because it seems to have jogged her memory that she was kidnapped and is in a strange place with the windows blocked and the doors locked. Apparently, she’s a bit slow on the uptake, but let’s not hold that against her, it only took her four minutes to realize she might want to leave soon. She continues running around, etc., then she passes out from panic. Good transition guys.

She awakes to a bearded Dennis Hopper smiling over her. Everyone, let’s take a quiz—You have just passed out in a unknown house after being kidnapped, discovered that every exit is blocked, and saw a weird painting . You wake up to see a bearded Dennis Hopper smiling that smile. Don’t pretend you don’t know that smile. That smile that says “I’m paternal and kind-hearted in appearance but clearly I’m a sociopath-molester in disguise.” What’s the proper response? If your answer wasn’t “scream,” you’re clearly brain damaged.

Did I mention he’s stroking her head? Because that’s happening. What’s the creepy level at now everyone? It’s at “that guy on the bus” level.

Also, Dennis Hopper has an Irish accent. Let me say that one more time, because I need to make sure you got it—Dennis Hopper has an Irish accent. The Lucky Charms guy is more convincing than him. No, not enough, sorry, the fake Irish accent you used in middle school to make an alcoholics joke is more convincing than Dennis Hopper’s accent. Of course he’s a Catholic priest, that’s self-evident! And of course he’s not the only Irish character, don’t be silly! The other one's a drug addict. The Irish! They’re either priests or drunk.

Anyway, Survivor doesn’t scream (following her character nicely) and sees a bunch of people who we saw were also kidnapped and also a bunch of people who we didn’t see. Are they impostors? Are they pulling the strings the whole time? What insidious purpose could they have?! The answer is no, no, and nothing, they were also kidnapped-- just off-screen. SO WHY SHOW US THOSE OTHER PEOPLE BEING KIDNAPPED?!! WHAT DID THAT ACHIEVE?!! It would have been equally effective to show just one person being kidnapped and not subject us to that stupid montage! We would have gotten it! We aren’t stupid! Well okay I am. A little. I am watching this thing.

The characters do have names and we even get to hear them once or twice but they leave so little impact and I care so little about them that I’m going to give them colorful nicknames to help me relieve the boredom and also to properly identify the characters in the same manner the writers clearly did. We have Survivor, Father Hopper, Bitch, Druggie, Cop, No Impact Man, No Impact Woman, Frenchman, and Hurtful Ethnic Stereotype (I do love that HES is the only black character in the movie, and yes! He does rap! How did you know?). See? There’s nine of them! And they’re in a house! Hooray!

Anyway, some guy with a creepy voice who isn’t Jigsaw, honest, comes on over the intercom—he’s clearly very polite since he waited for Survivor to wake up before he began his monologue—and he tries to explain what’s going on. Apparently he picked them at random for “what they are” rather than who they are. Go ahead and try to make sense of that one. I certainly did and I got nothing. Is it because they are all disappointing examples of humanity? That is my guess. Also, he’s “settled with” all of the characters’ friends and family so no one is looking for them. And how did you accomplish that, Mister Intercom? You must have shilled out maybe ten dollars a person to make their friends and family forget they existed. They have integrity after all! He even says that it was “quite easy” in some cases. No! You don’t say! I’m sure Bitch did so much good with her life she’ll be dearly missed by all!

So the deal is that everyone in the house is a guinea pig in this guy’s social experiment/wanking material (never a good idea to mix the two, Mr. Intercom). He’s set up hidden cameras and microphones all over the house, and everyone in the house has to kill each other until there is one survivor (should I capitalize that? We all know who’ll win). The Survivor gets to leave with 5 million dollars and—wait, dollars? This is Britain! Dollars are basically the equivalent of toilet paper there! You spend all this cash to set up this elaborate house and kidnap participants in your weird Big-Brother snuff film, and you didn’t bother making the prize the currency of the country they live in?! Clearly this man is a mastermind for the ages!

But that’s the premise they’re going with, and since I already made one reality show joke I don’t think another is appropriate except to mention the Intercom mentions that this is like a reality show. No, really. This is probably where the writers took the inspiration for the wonderful characters we have to endure now.

The first things of these characters mouths are the stupidest questions and phrases one could ask or say in this scenario. “Who the fuck was that?” Does it matter? I think who in this scenario does not affect your situation in the slightest. “Was that it?” Do you need anymore?! Seems pretty self evident what’s happening! “This has to be some kind of a joke!” Okay, let’s recap. They kidnapped you! Do you think that’s a joke too?! But the most infuriating is “He told us only one will live. What does that mean? Is someone going to kill us?” Wow, Survivor, that panic attack must have been a stroke or something because there is NO WAY YOU DON’T GET WHAT'S HAPPENING RIGHT NOW! Everyone but you knows what the creep on the intercom wants! Are thick are you? Does light not escape from the emptiness of your skull?

Oh. My. God. No one else has figured it out either. She isn’t the exception. She’s the rule.

I’m pretty sure I’ve abandoned all hope for these characters at this point. We are twelve minutes in at this point, and I’m positive all hope of escape has dried up as fast as the brain cells of every person there. They should drink some water or antifreeze or something.

Cop, who possesses an absurd mustache that is probably the envy of the Victorian-era detective story he was ripped from, is the only one to have figured it out, meaning he has to explain it to the audience -I mean characters- and meaning he’s the only character I kind of like at this point. He also shows them his gun, as only good things can come from a gun at this point. HES begins taunting the cop because he’s a Hurtful Stereotype, the Frenchman explains it again because he’s French and is clearly insane and thus understands what’s happening. He seems almost boisterous about it. I wonder if that means anything for later. Nahhhh! It’s probably nothing. Then No Impact Man actually talks about the legality. LIKE THAT MEANS ANYTHING IN YOUR SCENARIO! WAKE UP! I think everyone kind of forgot they were drugged and kidnapped, otherwise the movie would trip over its own shoelaces. And it wears Velcro shoes.

The Cop states the obvious, which is literally what I just said above, and then says only he and Father Hopper are using their heads. Father Hopper has said basically nothing this far. So this statement is actually true, in my opinion, since he hasn’t said any of the stupid shit the other characters have been spitting out like watermelon seeds made of idiot. The cop refuses to play the Intercom’s game, which is when HES starts antagonizing the Cop and implying that if he gets the gun he’ll kill them all and take the prize without a second thought. I’m surprised this movie doesn’t come with an apology letter to everyone because of this character. This ranks up there with the stupidest shit one can say in this scenario, and since this is written as a part of this character’s identity the blatant racism of this character is amplified. What the hell does he think will happen if he says something like that? That they’ll give him the gun and line up quietly?

They try battering the door down with the table from the meeting room, but that fails. Not surprising, since whoever made this place would probably expect something like that. Surprisingly, Father Hopper does not suggest they use Ba-Bomb. Then the Cop tries shooting the window. Bullets have been known to be super effective against cinderblocks, but strangely they don’t work here.

Montage of them searching for a way out and them achieving nothing. Two! Hahaha!

Bitch goes straight for the liquor cabinet, apparently misinterpreting the words “way out of here” to a drastic degree. The Cop thinks that alcohol in this situation might be a bad idea for some reason, and confiscates the liquor cabinet key, angering Bitch. Everyone starts talking about the money and the game, with Frenchman relishing every word of his dialogue like it’s made of milkshake or something. I just get a bad vibe from him for some reason, I don’t know what it is really. They talk about desperation for a while because the movie really wants to be deep even though it’s shallower than tea spoon with a hole in it. The Cop insists that no one will play this game and shows he’s all noble and stuff. He even proclaims it to the video camera watching him. I’m sure he’ll survive. He’s just so inspiring.

This sort of thing continues for a while. I would go into more detail, but seriously there isn’t any point. Every character is basically the one label I gave to them. I hate them all equally at this point, and desperately want each one of them to die so now I don’t care about the moral dilemma of the characters so much as I wish the movie would end so I can eat some nachos. They prattle on, and antagonize each other (because that can only cause good), and it all goes nowhere. All of a sudden, HES talks about his rap career, and then starts rapping. Poorly. I won’t go into detail except to say Pitbull has more talent than this guy. A drunk Pitbull. Who also suffered a stroke so that he has no idea what words mean.

It’s hard to even make a joke about how dull the movie is at this point. I could go on and on, but I’d be repeating myself much like these characters repeat themselves and their one personality trait. HES raps in his sleep. There’s probably a joke to be made there. God save me I have no idea what it could be. We are only a third of the way into the movie at this point. Maybe I should stop and take a break at this point and finish up in a bit once something interesting happens. And make some nachos. Nachos are always interesting.

Saturday, August 6, 2011

First!

I've been blithering on and on about starting a blog like this for the better part of two years, and since I have very little in way of things to do in recent days what with work clogging up most of my time like a clock smeared with cholesterol, and since my opinions are worthless when I don't bother writing them down, and since my friend started her own blog, I've decided to put a weasel in my trousers (that's a phrase, right?) and face up to the challenge.

So I guess I need an introduction: I'm Ben Canner. I like movies. No, I'm not a film major, nor do I consider myself to be snobbish in an appropriately critical way, but I am an English major (which is the same basic type of analysis. Seriously. I'm not worthless I swear) and I regularly find myself embroiled in film culture and reviews, so I do know at least something of what I'm talking about mostly possibly no judgement. But the point is I like talking about movies and I like surfing Netflix for movies I haven't seen and picking ones at random and watching them even if they suck worse that a hooker-vacuum cyborg (a hoover?). And now I wish to subject/inform you of my own thoughts on the random shit no one knows about nor cares to remember. Consider me an archaeologist of celluloid tragedies, finding the occasional gold statute among the mountains of dirt and prehistoric crap.

The basic rules to my reviews are the following: 1) There will be spoilers in all my reviews. I'm giving you fair warning here that I will be reviewing the films as a whole and as such I'll need to discuss endings, and I don't want to ruin a movie for anyone. 2) I should post at least once a week. There's no reason I can't sit down for a film at least once in any given week, regardless of what's going on, and it would be irresponsible for me to have a blog and not use it like a turkey baster or a whisk or a whole bunch of things I find in my pantry when I'm smashed and bored. 3) I want people to have fun. I don't anyone to feel like I'm personally attacking their preferred genre or film because I'm a jerk. I tend to use hyperbole in everyday conversation because everyday conversation is kinda dull otherwise. "I saw a large fly" is an okay if somewhat bizarre sentence, but "I saw a fly so huge another fly was riding it like a horse" grabs people, even if it too is a weird sentence in normal conversation unless you study these sorts of things as you collect corpses for your meat locker (whoops there it is again). Point is I don't want to hurt anyone's feelings or insult anyone; If I don't like a movie, that's my opinion, although I reserve the right to beat a movie senseless if I don't like it. I am human.

More rules to follow, and my first review. Let's hope it's a good one! Hope everyone likes the blog!